Organic Food Labeling Rules 'Should be Based on Science, Not Public Opinion Polls' Says NFPA

NFPA Press Release
March 7, 2000

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Department of Agriculture's proposed national guidelines for the labeling and marketing of organic foods "would be stronger if they reflected sound science, rather than popular opinion," in addressing the issues of biotechnology and irradiation, according to the National Food Processors Association (NFPA).

"By excluding the products of agricultural biotechnology, as well as products that have been treated with irradiation, USDA has limited the tools available to farmers and food producers to enhance the safety and quality of the food supply," said Kelly Johnston, NFPA's Executive Vice President of Government Affairs and Communications. "USDA's decision was based in large measure on the volume of comments received by organic activists. While the public's views are important, rules governing food labeling and food safety must be based on sound science‹and sound science cannot be determined by public opinion polling."

Johnston stated that "NFPA strongly believes that both biotechnology and food irradiation should be permitted in the 'organic' standard, for the simple fact that there is no scientifically supportable reason to exclude them. For example, modern biotechnology can introduce traits into products that would minimize the use of chemicals, such as pest-resistant crops. Why should organic farmers not be permitted to use a technology that can lead to reduced use of pesticides? And irradiation‹or 'cold pasteurization,' as it is often referred to‹can eliminate or greatly reduce dangerous pathogens on foods, while causing no material change to the food's taste or nutritional content. Irradiation is a powerful tool to help assure food safety‹something that should be of particular concern to the organic industry, which uses a great deal of manure as fertilizer."

Johnston stated that "A national standard‹clearly defining what the term 'organic' means‹is in the interests of grower, processors, and consumers. However, it is important that consumers understand that those foods labeled as 'organic' are neither safer nor more nutritious than conventional foods. 'Organic simply means the product in question follows a defined standard of production and handling. Organic products provide consumers with a marketplace option‹but they should not be viewed as a safer or healthier alternative to conventional products."

** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for research and educational purposes only. **